February 12, 2012

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintEmail

Editorial: Vote for Castelli for change

It is clear what the overriding issue of this abbreviated campaign for the 89th District seat on the New York State Assembly is this year: Taxes.

 

Both candidates, Democrat Peter Harckham and Republican Robert Castelli, are vowing to reduce taxes, have very similar platforms, and would be excellent choices to represent Lewisboro and Katonah in Albany. But for once, being a member of the minority party in Albany has its advantages this year and makes Mr. Castelli the right choice on Tuesday.

This is the time for challengers of the status quo in Albany to take office and a stand against high taxes and the “three-men-in-a-room” political machine. In the past, the legislative voices of the minority party were easily drowned out — but that has since changed. Now, those same party members are bolstered by an electorate that is so fed up with high taxes that only months ago it forced out the seemingly invincible Andy Spano from county office. Due to the political climate both locally and nationally, the time is finally right to push for reforming Albany, its unfunded mandates, and its carefree spending ways.

Unfortunately for Mr. Harckham, his party leadership does not like opposition from within its ranks, and has been known to remove financial and political backing from those that do. Mr. Harckham will continue to be an independent voice if elected, but his own political survival will force him to be muted at times and limit his ability to effect change.

Mr. Castelli does not have the same political constraints and has vowed to be a much-needed reformer. He wants to end Wicks Law and the Triborough Amendment, which foist needless taxes on residents both locally and on the state level, and move power from party leadership to Assembly and Senate members. In addition, he wants to restore the STAR tax rebates, and wants to create housing in this area that will keep emergency workers in the communities they serve. Mr. Castelli also understands that water quality issues are a major concern in northern Westchester and points to his environmental record as a Lewisboro Town Board member, when he helped pass among the first wetlands and open space laws in northern Westchester, as proof that he will protect the water and environment.

The need for change in Albany is not new, but the ability to bring that about is. Electing Mr. Castelli is injecting a reformer into the heart of Albany when the old tax-and-spend regime is most vulnerable. For once, a chance at real reform is not idle rhetoric.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
 

Comments 

 
#1 Jeff M. 2010-02-04 12:21
Surely you jest! The qualifications you claim for Castelli apply TEN TIMES OVER to Harckham. Your main argument is that Castelli would be more effective because he is NOT a Democrat? So would he be as effective as, say, Greg Ball, who went to Albany from our neighboring district claiming he was going to "shake things up" and has now given up and decided to run for State Senate instead? Look at the makeup in Albany: The Assembly is solidly Democratic and will remain that way. A Republican doesn't have a chance in... well, Albany... of making a dent there, no matter how much he stomps his feet. Pete Harckham is not someone who will back down just because the party leadership doesn't like his positions. He proved that against Bill Ryan. Your logic is seriously flawed!
 
 
#2 rtk212 2010-02-05 21:11
I would have to agree with Jeff. Harckham has proved that he is willing to challenge his party's leaders and push for what he thinks is right. With the wind at his back and with support of this district, he would certainly be able to make a bigger dent in the decay that Albany has become over the years. Mr. Castelli will be a voice in the forrest, unheard.
 
 
#3 J. D. Piro 2010-02-07 07:35
I'm still not hearing an explanation as to why sending another liberal Democrat to a legislature controlled by liberal Democrats will effect change in Albany. Mr. Harckham's record shows no evidence that Mr. Harckham bucks his party--his flip-flop on the government housing settlement is proof that he will toe the line for the Democratic agenda. And the Democrats appear to be happy to see him vote against a tax increase, as long as his vote won't make a difference to the outcome. Again, not seeing where a vote for Mr. Harckham creates change.
 
 
#4 Jeff M. 2010-02-07 15:23
I'm still not hearing an explanation as to why sending another Republican who claims he's going to cut taxes to a legislature controlled by Democrats will effect change in Albany. The Assembly is going to remain solidly in Democratic hands, owing to the number of representatives from NYC. Despite your frequent use of typical buzzwords like "liberal" and "flip-flop" the evidence is that Mr. Harckham DID buck the Democratic establishment in Westchester, and IS effective at both working with Republicans and pushing for real change with his colleagues of both parties. At the very least, as a member of the majority, Mr. Harckham would have more influence over the amount of our tax dollars that is returned to the district, and in promoting the interests of our district in any pending legislation. A Republican with no influence whatsoever would not be able to achieve anything.
 
 
#5 J. D. Piro 2010-02-07 15:39
I agree that the Assembly will remain under the control of liberal tax-and-spend politicians if we don't start sending fiscal conservatives to Albany.

Your argument appears to be that Mr. Harckham can effect change with a liberal majority that appears impervious to change. How'd that work out for him in White Plains?

And if Mr. Harckham can't change things, he'll get us a bit more "state aid" to pay for the mandates he and his friends will impose. Except that Albany's "state aid" is always a day later and several million dollars short. (See the school board budget.)

Besides "state aid" comes from state revenue, which comes from higher income taxes, which are paid by us!

It's hard to see how taxpayers come out ahead by sending another liberal tax-and-spend Democrat to work with other liberal tax-and-spend Democrats in Albany.
 
 
#6 reeve1 2010-02-07 16:43
Curious that Jeff is down on Greg Ball (who is not running in this election)for jumping to run for Senate, though ignoring that Peter ran again for County Legislator even though he knew by March that Bradley's seat was open (that he was running for WP Mayor unopposed). Was reelected and jumped ship one month later!?
 
 
#7 rtk212 2010-02-07 17:00
This is not a discussion about policy or issues, this is a back and forth between people supporting political parties and not much more. There is little to gain from this and it is a shame since there are some very difficult decisions we as citizens will have to make if our town, state and nation are going to get back on its feet. Unfortunatly not one person, elected or not, is going to do it alone, it is going to take all of us working towards something much bigger than each of us individually.
Robert Kesten
 
 
#8 J. D. Piro 2010-02-07 17:08
On the contrary, this is a pretty substantive discussion among people of good will who hold strong, well-articulated and well-defended views. Exactly the kind of exchanges sites such as this one are meant to encourage.
 
 
#9 reeve1 2010-02-07 17:09
rtk212m-What in Mr. Harckham's two years as a Lefislator gives you a comfort level that he will succeed where Naomi Matesow and Adam Bradley failed? Was it his vote for the housing settlement just after touring area towns saying he opposed it? or his vote for the 2009 county budget which made us the highest taxed country in the USA?

he did agree to cut the county legislature's staff costs by 11%-but only after a crusade by the Journal News pointed out they were the highest in the state and one staffer was placed under investigation. Was that reform?
 
 
#10 Shadow31 2010-02-08 08:36
Sheldon Silver won't run over Bob Castelli, warts though he may have.
 

Commenting is reserved for registered users.

Log in or register a new account.

The Lewisboro Ledger, 16 Bailey Avenue, Ridgefield, CT 06877  |  Contact The Lewisboro Ledger